On 9/23/2014 10:09 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
I suspect such a thing will quickly become obsolete.
I'm sure it will. The point is that I think it can have utility to get
folks thinking in terms of a potentially wide /range/ of choice, with
the document giving a snapshot in time of choices
Steven M Jones writes:
On 09/22/2014 03:17 PM, Josh Aberant wrote:
Who uses X-Original-From ? This is a real question, I'm not
aware of anyone who does.
At Twitter we use the X-Original-From to route our security
tickets with users within our ticketing system Salesforce. Users
On 09/23/2014 10:26 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
On 09/22/2014 03:17 PM, Josh Aberant wrote:
alias. Google Groups (takes ownership of the From per our
#RejectPolicy) and then
I don't understand our #RejectPolicy. What are you talking about?
Surely not DMARC? That reject policy
Brandon Long writes:
In any case, support folks, especially when dealing with paying
customers, tend to want to get all of the email, they don't want
their nicely paying customers to not get support just because of
spam false positives or the mail routing breaking dkim.
Sure, but this
On September 23, 2014 8:22:41 PM EDT, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
Brandon Long writes:
Sorry, they often term the messages as notifications instead of
posts, when they actually contain the full post and author
information/etc.
I guess I'd need to see one to decide how I
Scott Kitterman writes:
On September 23, 2014 8:22:41 PM EDT, Stephen J. Turnbull
step...@xemacs.org wrote:
I don't recall commercial service Groups using that mode, though
-- they always have the author in From IIRC.
Except at the very least Google Groups.
If you are talking about
