Re: [dmarc-ietf] Dmarc-escape draft available

2015-04-23 Thread Douglas Otis
On 4/23/15 10:53 AM, Terry Zink wrote: > Doug, > >> It takes seconds using OS X Mail … >> >> For Thunderbird, users will need to access … >> >> For other MUAs this may require plugins or similar >> tinkering… >> >> Nonetheless, Sender header protection is >> available and likely something better c

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Dmarc-escape draft available

2015-04-23 Thread Hector Santos
No. On 4/23/2015 1:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: Since the core lookup key off of which everything in DMARC is based is the 5322.From, if you change to use something different, is it even DMARC anymore? Scott K On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:33:53 PM Terry Zink wrote: I’ve played around a b

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Dmarc-escape draft available

2015-04-23 Thread Terry Zink
Doug, > It takes seconds using OS X Mail … > > For Thunderbird, users will need to access … > > For other MUAs this may require plugins or similar > tinkering… > > Nonetheless, Sender header protection is > available and likely something better configured using a > script offered by the provider.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Dmarc-escape draft available

2015-04-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
Since the core lookup key off of which everything in DMARC is based is the 5322.From, if you change to use something different, is it even DMARC anymore? Scott K On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:33:53 PM Terry Zink wrote: I’ve played around a bit with Gmail, Hotmail/outlook.com, and Outlook deskt

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Dmarc-escape draft available

2015-04-23 Thread Terry Zink
I’ve played around a bit with Gmail, Hotmail/outlook.com, and Outlook desktop client. Here’s what I have found so far. Gmail and Hotmail have similar but not identical behavior: 1. If the 5322.From address is in your address book or you have a conversational history (implicit contact) or