Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support

2015-05-04 Thread Franck Martin
- Original Message - > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > To: "Kurt Andersen" > Cc: dmarc@ietf.org, "Murray S. Kucherawy" , "Franck > Martin" > Sent: Saturday, May 2, 2015 9:56:44 AM > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support > > Kurt Andersen writes: > > > On Thu,

Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support

2015-05-04 Thread Hector Santos
+1 I agree alternatives should not, nor has it even been required, to offer "criticism" in reviews. However, in this case, for what its worth, I didn't see/read Kurt's comment as criticism so I don't think the outburst was warranted. Kurt might explain what he meant but I believe the 5322.Li

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC,SPF, null senders, and indirect mail flow

2015-05-04 Thread Anne Bennett
FM = Franck Martin AB = Anne Bennett MK = Murray S. Kucherawy FM Note that postfix/sendmail can DKIM sign the bounces it creates. AB>>> A few weeks ago I searched for documentation on how to make AB>>> Sendmail sign its bounces, and I failed to find anything. AB>>> If you could point me a

Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support

2015-05-04 Thread Dave Crocker
On 5/2/2015 9:56 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Guys, if you want to attack a proposal, please make one first. Small process comment: It's always best to offer a solution when one offers a criticism. But it's not required. If something won't work, it won't work. Although des

Re: [dmarc-ietf] OpenDKIM ADSP, DMARC and ATPS support

2015-05-04 Thread Dave Crocker
On 4/30/2015 10:03 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote: > With List-Id becoming a more generic feedback channel, Kurt, forgive my confusion but I don't understand what it means for List-ID to be a 'feedback channel'. List-ID provides some identification. How does that make it a channel and specifically a fe