On 10/12/2017 01:17 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
SRS "didn't work" (catch on) because there is/was a fundamental
concept/idea/methodology/philosophy/taboo that the Return Path
(5321.MailFrom) should never be changed/altered/tampered with along the
transport path/route.
Interesting.
That's new
On 10/12/2017 2:53 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
* There is a kludge called SRS that embeds the original bounce
address in the forwarder's bounce address, but it doesn't help.
Where can I find out more about how / why SRS does not help.
I've been aware of SRS for quite some time and I always
