In article <cal0qlwa+fouikxkwevzy8wu-tjqerqc1o9sesuip7pug3f4...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Et voila. If you go to the "History" tab and request a diff from the >individual -00 to the working group -00, you can see all of the changes >made relative to RFC7601. Basically it loosens up the language about what >categories of things can be recorded, makes the ABNF changes requested, and >guts some stuff copied from RFC7601 that doesn't need to be there for this >version because it describes registry changes that were already made by >that RFC. > >Let me know if I missed anything.
Seems fine, although I've long found 7601 one of the most mysterious RFCs ever published. The IANA registry says that there is a dkim header.i property defined in RFC7601, but the only place it appears in 7601 is in examples in Appendix B. Section 2.4 says that a "policy" property is how you report a local policy that overrides the regular result, but I see policy=reject in reports about DMARC where it's just copying the p= from the _dmarc record. Is that right? If not, where if anywhere should it be reported? Can we add DKIM header.a here, please? R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
