On Monday, February 19, 2018 08:42:24 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:49 AM, John Levine wrote:
> > Seems fine, although I've long found 7601 one of the most mysterious RFCs
> > ever published.
>
> Why's that? (And why wasn't this mentioned when 7601 or any of its
> ant
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Seems fine, although I've long found 7601 one of the most mysterious RFCs
ever published.
Why's that? (And why wasn't this mentioned when 7601 or any of its
antecedents was in last call? No errata?)
I admit I could have been paying more attent
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 3:49 AM, John Levine wrote:
> Seems fine, although I've long found 7601 one of the most mysterious RFCs
> ever published.
>
Why's that? (And why wasn't this mentioned when 7601 or any of its
antecedents was in last call? No errata?)
> The IANA registry says that there
