Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

2020-10-01 Thread Seth Blank
Dave, disengage from this thread. Continuing to publicly attack a participant who's been asked to disengage and so far has done so is not acceptable. This is a formal warning. The chairs and ADs will be in touch. Feel free to reach out to us directly in the meantime if you so wish. Seth, as

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

2020-10-01 Thread Dave Crocker
On 9/30/2020 9:37 PM, Seth Blank wrote: Hector, the chairs hear your frustration, thank you for not escalating further, and would be happy to speak with you off list on the matter. Seth, Please reread the post you responded to.  It is, in fact, an escalation.  The tone you've set with your

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Call for Adoption: DMARC Use of the RFC5322.Sender Header Field

2020-10-01 Thread Dave Crocker
On 9/30/2020 9:37 PM, Seth Blank wrote: Hector, the chairs hear your frustration, thank you for not escalating further, and would be happy to speak with you off list on the matter. Seth, Please reread the post you responded to.  It is, in fact, an escalation.  The tone you've set with your