On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:36 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 12/14/20 7:26 PM, Douglas Foster wrote:
> >
> > But what I am trying to figure out is under what circumstances a DMARC
> > policy can be considered actionable. Do I conclude that
> > "p=quarantine" means "domain is still collecting
On Tue 15/Dec/2020 04:26:03 +0100 Douglas Foster wrote:
Sorry about the confusion caused by my typing failures.
What I meant:
First party - From address aligns with SMTP address. Can be validated with SPF
or DKIM.
Third party - From address and SMTP address are in different domains. Can be
On Mon 14/Dec/2020 20:17:37 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article
you write:
I'm seeing a report where the XML contains two SPF records within a single
auth_results entity. This doesn't seem correct.
It's specifically allowed in the XML schema.
Yup:
In this case I'd guess it
On Mon 14/Dec/2020 16:57:53 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote:
From: John R Levine
The goal was to clarify the language, without (to the best of our ability)
changing the schema. I'd welcome a other attempts at clarifications (if you
believe mine introduces structural XML changes).
So it'd say
