Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, September 23, 2021 3:03:39 AM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:59 PM Scott Kitterman > > wrote: > > I can comment on the status of PSD. > > Please do! There is progress, but it is still early to expect much in the way of information. Keep in mind that

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-23 Thread Douglas Foster
For messages sent from Office365, Microsoft applies an initial ARC set, and declares the message to be DMARC-compliant.I do not think Microsoft should be passing judgement on messages that it is originating, or attributing an SPF result to a message that was only just submitted with SMTP AUTH.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-23 Thread Trent Adams
Piling onto Alex's response... we have some ARC functionality deployed and servicing customers. I'm currently looking into what useful data we can extract and share what we've learned from the implementation (which may lead to some useful topics to discuss in more depth). In a related

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-23 Thread Brotman, Alex
Murray, We’ve started (relatively recently, in volume) logging ARC data so we can try to make some informed decisions going forward. We’re not yet acting on anything as a result, nor writing into the message. We’re also not doing anything when mail is being forwarded. We’ll hopefully have

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Experiments

2021-09-23 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 1:59 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > I can comment on the status of PSD. > Please do! ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc