Re: [dmarc-ietf] Figuring out the tree walk

2022-02-14 Thread John Levine
It appears that Scott Kitterman quoted: >>- If there's evidence of intent, then the argument is "The >> definition of alignment needs to change, because the current >> definition isn't what the authors intended and it exposes domains to >> security/abuse risks." >>- If not, then the

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Figuring out the tree walk

2022-02-14 Thread Dotzero
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 10:46 AM Todd Herr wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:16 PM Dotzero wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 4:30 PM Scott Kitterman >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> I think "a" would be cleanest, but I think it would cause too much >>> backward >>> compatibility trouble and

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Figuring out the tree walk

2022-02-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, February 14, 2022 10:45:39 AM EST Todd Herr wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:16 PM Dotzero wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 4:30 PM Scott Kitterman > > > > wrote: > >> I think "a" would be cleanest, but I think it would cause too much > >> backward > >> compatibility trouble and

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Figuring out the tree walk

2022-02-14 Thread Todd Herr
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 5:16 PM Dotzero wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 4:30 PM Scott Kitterman > wrote: > > >> >> I think "a" would be cleanest, but I think it would cause too much >> backward >> compatibility trouble and should not be further considered. In previous >> working group