[dmarc-ietf] Tree Walk Limitations vs PSL

2022-03-30 Thread Douglas Foster
Limitations of the Tree Walk method, listed roughly from highest to lowest importance Private Registries The PSL has data on private registries, while the tree walk will only know about private registries if and when each registry or its clients publish DMARC policies. Exceptions The PSL is easil

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree Walk + CNAME

2022-03-30 Thread John Levine
It appears that Tim Wicinski said: >> What should the evaluator do if one of these results in a CNAME that >> either: >> >> a) points outside of the tree >> > >I would say "Follow the CNAME" - consider LargeCo which points many DMARC >records >of domains in their portfolio to a record in

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Tree Walk + CNAME

2022-03-30 Thread Tim Wicinski
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:50 AM Brotman, Alex wrote: > >From section 4.6: > > To illustrate, for a message with the arbitrary RFC5322.From domain >of "a.b.c.d.e.mail.example.com", a full DNS Tree Walk would require >the following five queries, in order to locate the policy or >Organiz

[dmarc-ietf] Tree Walk + CNAME

2022-03-30 Thread Brotman, Alex
>From section 4.6: To illustrate, for a message with the arbitrary RFC5322.From domain of "a.b.c.d.e.mail.example.com", a full DNS Tree Walk would require the following five queries, in order to locate the policy or Organizational Domain: * _dmarc.a.b.c.d.e.mail.example.com * _d