>> Glad to have your opinion on this. What is your process for determining
>> whether a private registrar's clients use their subtree for mail?
>
> Look at them and see if they'd be plausibly be used for mail.
And to throw something else out here:
"Look at them and see if they'd be plausibly be
It appears that Douglas Foster said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Glad to have your opinion on this. What is your process for determining
>whether a private registrar's clients use their subtree for mail?
Look at them and see if they'd be plausibly be used for mail. Those
Amazon subtress are names they u
The main gist of the change was resolving a few inconsistencies that were
reported, as well as a few typos. Thanks folks.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc On Behalf Of internet-
> dra...@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, A
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : DMARC Aggregate Reporting
Author : Alex Brotman
Filena
No. We went through all this before and that's not correct. Tree walk is no
worse than the PSL for private registries. For public registries it is in many
cases much better. In many cases IANA has contractual control that is much
stronger than any management controls in the PSL.
There's not
This is a fundamental flaw in the design, not a problem to be fixed on a
case-by-case basis.
Under the tree walk, any private registry client can impersonate the parent
or a sibling, simply by publishing a non-org DMARC policy and then letting
the tree walk proceed into the parent organization. Y
