Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07

2022-04-22 Thread John Levine
It appears that Damian Lukowski said: >> In practice, the code that parses DMARC just splits the input into >> xxx=yyy pairs of tag and value strings and checks the values >> semantically. > >For those, who do not work at the IETF, Nobody here works at the IETF. > the spec comes before the impl

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

2022-04-22 Thread Todd Herr
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 9:15 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > On April 22, 2022 7:35:29 AM UTC, Robert wrote: > >In section 4.8. Organizational Domain Discovery, we have: > > > > Note: There is no need to perform Tree Walk searches for > > Organizational Domains under any of the following con

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

2022-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
On April 22, 2022 7:35:29 AM UTC, Robert wrote: >In section 4.8. Organizational Domain Discovery, we have: > > Note: There is no need to perform Tree Walk searches for > Organizational Domains under any of the following conditions: >... > * There is no SPF pass result and no DKIM pass re

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ABNF errors on RFC7489 and dmarcbis-07

2022-04-22 Thread Olivier HUREAU
>For those, who do not work at the IETF, the spec comes before the >implementation. If the spec defines a grammar that looks as >authoritative as the one in section 5.4, then an implementation might just >solve a decision problem whether a string matches >the grammar or not. This is a yes or no

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-07.txt

2022-04-22 Thread Robert
In section 4.8. Organizational Domain Discovery, we have: Note: There is no need to perform Tree Walk searches for Organizational Domains under any of the following conditions: ... * There is no SPF pass result and no DKIM pass result for the message. In this case, there can be no