Re: [dmarc-ietf] moving past pad=y?

2022-06-29 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:18 AM Douglas Foster < dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on our psl information, a private registry will be at DNS segment 3 > or 4. If the PSO registration is at DNS segment 2, the private registry > could be either one or two segments thick. > What i

Re: [dmarc-ietf] moving past pad=y?

2022-06-29 Thread Douglas Foster
Based on our psl information, a private registry will be at DNS segment 3 or 4. If the PSO registration is at DNS segment 2, the private registry could be either one or two segments thick. So the question is "How do I know which one applies?" The best solution is for the domain owner registrar

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On June 29, 2022 5:13:14 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >On Wed 29/Jun/2022 12:40:36 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On June 29, 2022 10:16:00 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>> On Tue 28/Jun/2022 18:46:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On June 28, 2022 4:33:15 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Wed 29/Jun/2022 12:40:36 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On June 29, 2022 10:16:00 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: On Tue 28/Jun/2022 18:46:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On June 28, 2022 4:33:15 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: What can one find continuing the walk after psd=y? For exam

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread John R Levine
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote: Would you please show an example, realistic or not, where not stopping for psd=y in step 2 leads to a useful result? Keeping in mind that this is an arcane corner case that affects perhaps a few hundred of the 100,000 domains that are likely to pub

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread Scott Kitterman
On June 29, 2022 10:16:00 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >On Tue 28/Jun/2022 18:46:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On June 28, 2022 4:33:15 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> >>> What can one find continuing the walk after psd=y? >>> >>> For example, let's consider an imaginary bank, com.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 28/Jun/2022 18:46:18 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On June 28, 2022 4:33:15 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: What can one find continuing the walk after psd=y? For example, let's consider an imaginary bank, com.bank, say. They use that domain as corporate domain, and have a DMARC reco

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Final, I hope, tweaks to the tree walk

2022-06-29 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Wed 29/Jun/2022 00:23:08 +0200 John R Levine wrote: What can one find continuing the walk after psd=y? I have looked at every domain in the PSL that publishes a DMARC record and other than the three that are in Scott's PSD list, what I found was totally random.  Some looked reasonable, som