Re: [dmarc-ietf] premature optimizations, Shortcuts: parent-child allows shorter tree walks

2022-07-24 Thread Douglas Foster
When a topic is decided with consensus, it does not get reopened.What happened here? On Sun, Jul 24, 2022, 9:35 PM John R Levine wrote: > >> I hope you agree that .com is a domain. The spec says that in order to > >> discover the Organizational Domain for a domain, I can perform the DNS >

Re: [dmarc-ietf] premature optimizations, Shortcuts: parent-child allows shorter tree walks

2022-07-24 Thread John R Levine
I hope you agree that .com is a domain. The spec says that in order to discover the Organizational Domain for a domain, I can perform the DNS Tree Walk as needed for any of the domains in question. That way, the domain in question, .com, is the Organizational Domain of itself. That is wrong

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Shortcuts: parent-child allows shorter tree walks

2022-07-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On July 24, 2022 9:58:46 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >John, > >On Sat 23/Jul/2022 19:52:33 +0200 John Levine wrote: >> As I would hope everyone in this discussion would be aware, the "as if" >> rule applies to all IETF standards. You can do whatever you want so long >> as the result is

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Shortcuts: parent-child allows shorter tree walks

2022-07-24 Thread Douglas Foster
Ale's point is part of a larger inefficiency. As information is gathered, the candidate names can be reviewed for a match. If a match is obtained, the result is PASS and the algorithm exits. If not, then candidate names which can be ruled out are discarded. If this makes the candidate list

[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Jul 24 06:00:04 2022

2022-07-24 Thread John Levine
Count| Bytes | Who ++--- 44 ( 100%) | 275972 ( 100%) | Total 14 (31.8%) | 85847 (31.1%) | Scott Kitterman 13 (29.5%) | 71816 (26.0%) | Alessandro Vesely 8 (18.2%) | 40989 (14.9%) | John Levine 4 ( 9.1%) | 43642 (15.8%) | Douglas Foster

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Shortcuts: parent-child allows shorter tree walks

2022-07-24 Thread Alessandro Vesely
John, On Sat 23/Jul/2022 19:52:33 +0200 John Levine wrote: As I would hope everyone in this discussion would be aware, the "as if" rule applies to all IETF standards. You can do whatever you want so long as the result is the same as if you had done what the spec says. The "as if" rule also