It appears that Mark Alley said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>This may have been thought of before, so forgive the potentially
>duplicate idea, I was musing earlier about feedback reporting based on a
>percent of the overall mail per-source. I'm thinking of something
>similar in concept to the pct= tag
Mike,
> You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
That's not an appropriate thing to say, and the rest of your message
stands fine without it. Please avoid these kinds of statements.
Barry, as chair.
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 1:59 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1) DMARC was a successful 2-company experiment, which was turned into a
> widely implemented informational RFP. We are now writing the
> standards-track version of that concept. We hope that
Adding clarification since I forgot to specify - this would be
per-sender per-source. Not a set percentage of all mail received from a
source, that obviously would not work as intended.
On 12/8/2022 6:52 AM, Mark Alley wrote:
This may have been thought of before, so forgive the potentially
This may have been thought of before, so forgive the potentially
duplicate idea, I was musing earlier about feedback reporting based on a
percent of the overall mail per-source. I'm thinking of something
similar in concept to the pct= tag for published policy.
This would reduce the overhead
