On 10 Sep 2023, at 18:14, Dotzero wrote:
>> I agree that the SHOULD language is not very useful because it’s likely to
>> be interpreted as only advice. Instead, I think we need a stronger
>> statement about the consequences of this policy. For example, “Domains
>> publishing p=reject MUST NOT
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 6:36 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are still trying to fix an evaluator problem by changing domain
> owner behavior. No harm in giving domain owners the warning, but changing
> evaluator behavior would be much better. Presumably,
We are still trying to fix an evaluator problem by changing domain
owner behavior. No harm in giving domain owners the warning, but changing
evaluator behavior would be much better. Presumably, the evaluator
behavior that we have today is the result of RFC 7489 wording, so we may be
able to
