What is your point / the information you find relevant here to WGLC of the
bis project?
We do many times this volume in a single day and are happy to share top
line stats.
Seth
-mobile
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 18:08 Matthäus Wander wrote:
> Here is an evaluation of 84k aggregate reports in
Here is an evaluation of 84k aggregate reports in the timespan of 2020-2024.
481 reporting organizations
derived from 896 distinct strings
---+---
44 use Organization Names ("Example")
with min=1, median=1.0, mean=1.11, max=3 distinct names
344 use Organizational Domains
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-27 10:00:
I changed that to /[0-9a-fA-F.:]{2,45}/, to allow "::", and inserted it
in dmarc-xml-0.2-short.xsd[*]. At the same time, I added a pattern for
"::1.2.3.4" in dmarc-xml-0.2.xsd[†].
I can live with either of these variants.
I'm not clear what will
On Tue 26/Mar/2024 21:57:46 +0100 Matthäus Wander wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-26 19:30:
No. To take several years and come up with a syntax which does not cover all
valid addresses is a sign of incompetence that this WG doesn't deserve, IMHO.
What do others think?
Let's rather
