Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice

2024-03-05 Thread Richard Clayton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message , Todd Herr writes >In a world in which two of the largest mailbox providers (Google >and Yahoo) are requiring SPF authentication Yahoo is not, AIUI, requiring SPF authentication ... the requirement is written to be rather more s

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice

2024-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
On March 5, 2024 2:54:10 PM UTC, Todd Herr wrote: >On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 6:30 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Section 5 has a paragraph that can fit Scott's solution to SPF spoofing. >> Here's a possible change: >> >> OLD >> A Domain Owner or PSO may choose not to participate i

Re: [dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice

2024-03-05 Thread Todd Herr
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 6:30 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > Hi, > > Section 5 has a paragraph that can fit Scott's solution to SPF spoofing. > Here's a possible change: > > OLD > A Domain Owner or PSO may choose not to participate in DMARC > evaluation by Mail Receivers simply by not publis

[dmarc-ietf] A possible point for SPF advice

2024-03-04 Thread Alessandro Vesely
Hi, Section 5 has a paragraph that can fit Scott's solution to SPF spoofing. Here's a possible change: OLD A Domain Owner or PSO may choose not to participate in DMARC evaluation by Mail Receivers simply by not publishing an appropriate DNS TXT record for its domain(s). A Domain Ow