On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Scott Kitterman skl...@kitterman.com
wrote:
As I read -08 what to do in that case is undefined. There's a dangling
pointer
to 5.6.3. It's dangling because nothing in that section addresses the
question of how to handle DKIM/SPF temporary errors.
5.6.3's
On Monday, December 22, 2014 11:16:01 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
On 12/22/2014 11:11 AM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Perhaps 5.6.3 needs something like SHOULD NOT act on DMARC policy if a
temporary error in SPF or DKIM processing prevents a full evaluation.
+1
We need to be careful about how
