>> I don't agree with the characterization of the second group. I would
>> say that we are partitioning messages into these two groups:
>> - Those for which we can confirm that they originated in the domain
>> they say they did.
>> - Those for which we can not confirm that.
>
> When we use
Barry's comment:
I don't agree with the characterization of the second group. I would
say that we are partitioning messages into these two groups:
- Those for which we can confirm that they originated in the domain
they say they did.
- Those for which we can not confirm that.
When we use
On 7/20/2021 7:50 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
I don't agree with the characterization of the second group. I would
say that we are partitioning messages into these two groups:
- Those for which we can confirm that they originated in the domain
they say they did.
- Those for which we can not confirm
Doug, I think the issue here is that I disagree with your premise, so
the rest of the argument fails for me:
> The goal is to partition all incoming messages into two mutually exclusive
> groups: Those messages which
> originated under domain owner control, and those which originated under
>
The goal is to partition all incoming messages into two mutually exclusive
groups: Those messages which originated under domain owner control, and
those which originated under domain owner control, and those which
originated outside domain owner control. This requires two things:
- First,
