On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 5:02 PM Jim Fenton wrote:
> About a year ago, I had suggested [1] that the reporting and policy
> mechanisms of DMARC be split, and was, I think, the only one supporting
> that idea. There were quite a few comments along the line of, "it's not
> broken, so why should we go
On 6/12/2020 8:02 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
On 6/12/20 10:49 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
About a year ago, I had suggested [1] that the reporting and policy
mechanisms of DMARC be split, and was, I think, the only one supporting
that idea.
Jim, I supported the proposal as well.
On 6/12/20 10:49 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Alessandro,
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri 12/Jun/2020 18:09:41 +0200 Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> On behalf of DMARC chairs I would like to ask for volunteers to edit future
>>> revisions of
Hi Alessandro,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri 12/Jun/2020 18:09:41 +0200 Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> >
> > On behalf of DMARC chairs I would like to ask for volunteers to edit future
> > revisions of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis. We are likely to
Hi,
On Fri 12/Jun/2020 18:09:41 +0200 Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On behalf of DMARC chairs I would like to ask for volunteers to edit future
revisions of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis. We are likely to split up the
current document into multiple drafts that can be progressed in parallel, so we
Hi all,
On behalf of DMARC chairs I would like to ask for volunteers to edit future
revisions of draft-kucherawy-dmarc-dmarcbis. We are likely to split up the
current document into multiple drafts that can be progressed in parallel, so we
are seeking multiple editors to help with this.
If you
