On Fri 14/May/2021 20:21:59 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote:
We "can avoid", but *must* we? There are a number of tickets this impacts.
Yes. Matt mentioned ticket #51 (added in the subject), for example.
That change might break consumers who meticulously check the values, but those
who just
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2021-05-14 20:12:
> In my tiny MX I have a cache of 631 aggregate reports received
> recently. 121 reports from 31 unique org_names have a /feedback/version
> element, 510 from 37 organizations don't. The latter group includes
> google.com, Yahoo! Inc., Verizon Media,
arc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Versioning and XML namespaces in aggregate
> reports (#33, #70)
>
> On Fri 14/May/2021 15:42:56 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote:
> > There are a few tickets that may break report ingestion systems due to
> structure and/or value changes. Sh
On Fri 14/May/2021 15:42:56 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote:
There are a few tickets that may break report ingestion systems due to
structure and/or value changes. Should we decide that's an implementation
issue, or that we truly can't change the format of the reports? I'm sure most
ingestion
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Versioning and XML namespaces in aggregate
> reports (#33, #70)
>
> Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2021-05-10 18:29:
> > On Mon 10/May/2021 17:28:20 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
> >> If an new spec merely /adds/ to a previous spec, then the presence o
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2021-05-10 18:29:
> On Mon 10/May/2021 17:28:20 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
>> If an new spec merely /adds/ to a previous spec, then the presence of
>> the new constructs is self-declaring. The only requirement is to have
>> the base specification declare that
On Mon 10/May/2021 17:28:20 +0200 Dave Crocker wrote:
On 5/10/2021 7:10 AM, Matthäus Wander wrote:
I support the use of the namespace declaration. A report with namespace
declaration allows for automatic syntax checks with XML Schema
Validation.
Version numbers, and the like, tend to be a lot
John Levine wrote on 2021-05-10 17:21:
> It appears that Matthäus Wander said:
>> 1) #33 suggests to add a versioned XML namespace declaration in the root
>> element.
>> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/33
>>
>> I support the use of the namespace declaration.
>
>
>> 4) How does the
On 5/10/2021 7:10 AM, Matthäus Wander wrote:
I support the use of the namespace declaration. A report with namespace
declaration allows for automatic syntax checks with XML Schema
Validation.
Version numbers, and the like, tend to be a lot less useful than
intuition leads one to expect.
The
It appears that Matthäus Wander said:
>1) #33 suggests to add a versioned XML namespace declaration in the root
> element.
>https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/33
>
>I support the use of the namespace declaration.
>4) How does the report generator know which format version the consumer
1) #33 suggests to add a versioned XML namespace declaration in the root
element.
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/33
I support the use of the namespace declaration. A report with namespace
declaration allows for automatic syntax checks with XML Schema
Validation. XSD validators refuse to
11 matches
Mail list logo
