Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain

2020-08-18 Thread Seth Blank
There is a ticket for tree walk: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/68 Please hold the conversation until the chairs open that thread. Seth, as Chair On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:49 AM Dave Crocker wrote: > On 8/18/2020 9:43 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > I do think the tree walk deserves

Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain

2020-08-18 Thread Dave Crocker
On 8/18/2020 9:43 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote: I do think the tree walk deserves another look.   Years back when it was brought up, there was lots of talk of overloading resolvers. But as someone who spent the past several years looking at the DNS query data of good sized SaaS domains, DMARC

Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain

2020-08-18 Thread Dave Crocker
On 8/18/2020 9:39 AM, John R Levine wrote: We've spun our wheels a lot trying to figure out a better way to find the organizational domain than for everyone to download the Mozilla PSL, but not about changing it to a tree walk. If we could come up with a better way for domains to publish

Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain

2020-08-18 Thread Tim Wicinski
Speaking not as a chair... I do think the tree walk deserves another look. Years back when it was brought up, there was lots of talk of overloading resolvers. But as someone who spent the past several years looking at the DNS query data of good sized SaaS domains, DMARC lookups (or even DMARC

Re: [dmarc-ietf] finer grained org domain

2020-08-18 Thread John R Levine
On Tue, 18 Aug 2020, Autumn Tyr-Salvia wrote: * Departments sending transactional email - move them to dedicated subdomains (this is where really complex institutions would benefit from walking the domain tree instead of always inheriting from the org domain) Is inheritance walking the domain