Re: [dmarc-ietf] new pull request, PSDs aren't important, was mustard

2022-07-21 Thread John Levine
It appears that Scott Kitterman said: >> https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/pull/52 > >Thanks. I think there are a nit in this change. > > * The RFC5322.From domain and the RFC5321.MailFrom domain (if SPF >- authenticated), and/or the DKIM d= domain (if present and aut

Re: [dmarc-ietf] new pull request, PSDs aren't important, was mustard

2022-07-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, July 20, 2022 4:23:00 PM EDT John R. Levine wrote: > I made another pass over the draft to clean up some of the descriptions. > The discussion of PSDs is shorter and clearer, and I made a few small > changes in the tree walk to make it clearer. > > >> I think we need to make clear th

Re: [dmarc-ietf] new pull request, PSDs aren't important, was mustard

2022-07-20 Thread John R. Levine
I made another pass over the draft to clean up some of the descriptions. The discussion of PSDs is shorter and clearer, and I made a few small changes in the tree walk to make it clearer. I think we need to make clear that the RFC5322.From domain, the RFC5321.MailFrom domain, and the DKIM d= d