> More generally, I think the document needs quite a bit of polish. The core
> material seems to be there but I've got some qualms with its organization,
> flow, etc. This may also be contributing to a false veneer of complexity.
> When I'm done the first round of coding, I'll route some energy
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Working group:
> Have all of you reviewed the ARC documents? Does the dearth of
> discussion of them mean they're close to ready?
>
I've been working on an open source implementation. It consists largely of