Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
In article you write: > Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc >passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to >update a section that will be removed. Only if we ask them to. I don't see anything in the draft asking them to take that section out. I'd prefer to leave them in, since hints about where to find working code are always helpful even if out of date. R's, John ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 7:15 AM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >> Thanks to you and Murray for carrying out that writeup. For a nit: >> >> There is one implementation already . . . >> >> Actually two. Besides Scott's implementation, zdkimfilter 1.7 implemented >> PSDDMARC since Tue 24 Sep 2019. https://www.tana.it/sw/zdkimfilter/. >> > > Thanks; I'll correct the writeup if necessary, but I think the document > itself includes that already in Appendix C. > Since information about existing implementations gets removed as a doc passes through the editor's hands, I'm not sure why it would matter to update a section that will be removed. --Kurt ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 3:49 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sat 07/Mar/2020 05:49:42 +0100 Tim Wicinski via Datatracker wrote: > > Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07 as > Experimental on behalf of the DMARC working group. > > > > Please verify the document's state at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/ > > > Thanks to you and Murray for carrying out that writeup. For a nit: > > There is one implementation already (by the author), and numerous > operators > have expressed intent to participate, including open source and private > operators, once the document is approved. > > Actually two. Besides Scott's implementation, zdkimfilter 1.7 implemented > PSDDMARC since Tue 24 Sep 2019. https://www.tana.it/sw/zdkimfilter/. > Thanks; I'll correct the writeup if necessary, but I think the document itself includes that already in Appendix C. -MSK ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
On 07/03/2020 11:48, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Sat 07/Mar/2020 05:49:42 +0100 Tim Wicinski via Datatracker wrote: >> Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07 as >> Experimental on behalf of the DMARC working group. >> >> Please verify the document's state at >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/ > > > Thanks to you and Murray for carrying out that writeup. For a nit: > > There is one implementation already (by the author), and numerous > operators > have expressed intent to participate, including open source and private > operators, once the document is approved. > > Actually two. Besides Scott's implementation, zdkimfilter 1.7 implemented > PSDDMARC since Tue 24 Sep 2019. https://www.tana.it/sw/zdkimfilter/. In fact, Rspamd uses PSL for DMARC reporting. Adding another composition policies list (if I understand the whole PSD idea correctly) should be trivial as there is a composition library that allows to extend PSL with additional rules. However, the current list is very small to be used for any practical purposes (at least as far as I see). ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07
On Sat 07/Mar/2020 05:49:42 +0100 Tim Wicinski via Datatracker wrote: > Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-07 as > Experimental on behalf of the DMARC working group. > > Please verify the document's state at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/ Thanks to you and Murray for carrying out that writeup. For a nit: There is one implementation already (by the author), and numerous operators have expressed intent to participate, including open source and private operators, once the document is approved. Actually two. Besides Scott's implementation, zdkimfilter 1.7 implemented PSDDMARC since Tue 24 Sep 2019. https://www.tana.it/sw/zdkimfilter/. Best Ale -- ___ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
