On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:29 AM John Levine wrote:
> In article <4666d39f-85f5-4ad2-a754-11fed0a5c...@kitterman.com> you write:
> >Perhaps I'm too pessimistic, but I don't think it's possible to actually
> make this clear to anyone that isn't familiar
> >with RFC 7489 without essentially turning this into a proto 7489bis.
>
> I agree. Hence my suggestion last week to tear out all of the TLD
> stuff or move it into an appendix and just say this is the name above
> the Organizational domain which you can find into RFC 7489.
>
> The reality is that any of the 8000 domains in the PSL could publish a
> PSD record, and I would not want to try to explain to anyone in the
> IESG why most of them are there. So let's stay as far away from that
> as possible. Policy Super Domain, remember?
After an initial "that's too cutesy" reaction, I'm becoming more convinced
that John's suggestion ("policy super domain") might indeed be the right
sort of solution - along with clearly citing 7489 in the intro and abstract
("If you don't know what DMARC is, go read RFC 7489 before coming back
here." or similar).
--Kurt
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
