A scenario that you did not list, but which used to be common was a mail
transit path that went both in and out of a foreign protocol. Consider the
example of a message that starts with SMTP --> X.400 (with irreversible
changes) --> SMTP --> recipient. If the inbound and outbound gateways are
not
or don't use p=quarantine and p=rejectKeep it simple
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 5:47 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Thu 17/Sep/2020 21:11:42 +0200 Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
> >
> > Wouldn’t it be nice if you could ask for MLMs to transform, just using a
> DMARC policy, even p=none,
Yes, I understood the section to be referring to those types of gateways. I
just don't understand where the problem occurs. There may be other gateways
in the future, so I am reluctant to say it ceases to be important.
I will try to phrase the question better:
It seems that there are three
On Thu 17/Sep/2020 21:11:42 +0200 Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
>
> Wouldn’t it be nice if you could ask for MLMs to transform, just using a
> DMARC policy, even p=none, so that you could test with a live environment
> containing MLMs that work around DMARC policy? Or you could ask for *no*
>
