Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread Tim Wicinski
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:28 PM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On Fri 19/Mar/2021 15:09:31 +0100 internet-drafts wrote: > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > [...] > > > Much better! > > There's still a few style points that I'd propose. They

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread Kurt Andersen (b)
Good work on the updated phrasing, I'd make just a couple of changes to the "tax" suggestion: On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > *Example* > > Since the algorithm (last word) hasn't been mentioned yet: > > OLD > Defensively registering all variants of "tax" is

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread Tim Wicinski
Agree with Murray. Also, I see changing "Algorithm" to "Specification" makes sense. looking at the other suggestions tim On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:54 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Just to nit-pick: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> There's still a few style

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Just to nit-pick: On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > There's still a few style points that I'd propose. They can be dealt with > in > auth48. > After Last Call, please. Don't wait for AUTH48 to process this feedback. -MSK

[dmarc-ietf] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

2021-03-19 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Happy to see this in my inbox this morning. Thanks to all that contributed to getting this final text to where we want it. A couple of minor points, which you can deal with after any Last Call comments come in rather than cranking a new version now: In the Introduction where you say "Public

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Fri 19/Mar/2021 15:09:31 +0100 internet-drafts wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. [...] Much better! There's still a few style points that I'd propose. They can be dealt with in auth48. *Introduction* The PSL is not mentioned yet.

[dmarc-ietf] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11

2021-03-19 Thread Tim Wicinski via Datatracker
Tim Wicinski has requested publication of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11 as Experimental on behalf of the DMARC working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-psd/ ___ dmarc mailing list

[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-11.txt

2021-03-19 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF. Title : Experimental DMARC Extension For Public Suffix Domains Authors