Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss:
ARC directly addresses (2). Unlike the measures for interoperating
with earlier schemes, adding an ARC-* header set does not in any way
impede or alter the traditional operation of mailing lists.
Consequently: if list operators perceive benefit in
+ dm...@ietf.org because Roland's responses should be
considered/captured there too.
Additional comment bottom-posted.
On 6/29/16 12:09 AM, Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss wrote:
Andreas Schulze wrote:
2)
a general point I'm still unsure about:
Andreas Schulze wrote:
> 2)
> a general point I'm still unsure about:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage say in 2.)
>
>> "If the mailing list implemented ARC, ..."
>
> ARC *require* the list operator (Intermediary) to install new or update
> existing - right?
No.
