Hi there! In 2013 the status of RFC 5617 "DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP)" was changed to 'historic'. The reasons given included: * ' ADSP has garnered almost no deployment and use in the 4 years since its advancement to IETF Proposed Standard.' * ' There have, for example, been real cases where a high-value domain published an ADSP record of "discardable", but allowed users on their domain to subscribe to mailing lists. When posts from those users were sent to other domains that checked ADSP, those subscriber domains rejected the messages, resulting in forced unsubscribes from mailman (due to bounces) for the unsuspecting subscribers.'
Since DMARC is basically ADSP on steroids and more complicated I have the following -serious- questions: * Is there any information available why ADSP has seen so little adoption? How is this issue addressed with DMARC? * Since the mailing lists issue also applies to DMARC and actually became part of the reason ADSP was dumped (see above) how did you make sure the same thing won't happen to DMARC? Kind regards, Julian Hansmann _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list dmarc-discuss@dmarc.org http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
