Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss:
That question has rather a large answer, parts of which span a
decade of work on email authentication. It might perhaps be simpler
to address the situation that's concerning you. Are you facing a
specific situation for which this creates a problem?
Andreas Schulze wrote:
> Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss:
>
>> Yes. In all of the cases above, the Organizational Domain for both
>> RFC5322.From and the DKIM/SPF authentication is example.com,
>> consequently they match in relaxed mode. The same would be true for:
>>
>> - RFC5322.From:
Andreas Schulze wrote:
> Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss:
>
>> Yes. In all of the cases above, the Organizational Domain for both
>> RFC5322.From and the DKIM/SPF authentication is example.com,
>> consequently they match in relaxed mode. The same would be true for:
>>
>> - RFC5322.From:
Roland Turner via dmarc-discuss:
Yes. In all of the cases above, the Organizational Domain for both
RFC5322.From and the DKIM/SPF authentication is example.com,
consequently they match in relaxed mode. The same would be true for:
- RFC5322.From: a.example.com
- DKIM or SPF authentication
A. Schulze wrote:
> I have a question about DMARC alignments.
>
> the usual case:
> - RFC5322.From: sub.example.com
> - DKIM or SPF authentication identifier: example.com
>
> -> this is aligned in relax mode.
>
> But:
> - RFC5322.From: example.com
> - DKIM or SPF authentication identifier:
Hello,
I have a question about DMARC alignments.
the usual case:
- RFC5322.From: sub.example.com
- DKIM or SPF authentication identifier: example.com
-> this is aligned in relax mode.
But:
- RFC5322.From: example.com
- DKIM or SPF authentication identifier: sub.example.com
Is this a
