On Mon 29/Jun/2020 15:01:07 +0200 Doug Foster wrote:
Very creative suggestion. We need some new ideas.
However, I just checked my MUAs. All of them assume that "To" is
unimportant, so it is not displayed in the message list. "To" only appears
in the message view (including the Preview
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020, at 9:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
> This makes me wonder how many mailing lists still don't add DKIM
> signatures. Unlike the header rewriting hacks, they don't affect the
> way recipients see or handle the mail in their inboxes.
The HTTPbis list and Full Disclosure immediately
On 6/30/2020 1:49 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Sat 27/Jun/2020 03:44:55 +0200 John Levine wrote:
This makes me wonder how many mailing lists still don't add DKIM
signatures.
Lists at vger.kernel.org and savannah.nongnu.org are not signed.
There are also some which don't seem to have
This makes me wonder how many mailing lists still don't add DKIM
signatures. Unlike the header rewriting hacks, they don't affect the
way recipients see or handle the mail in their inboxes.
DKIM signing would certainly make it easier for receivers but I'm hesitant
to try and mandate it for
You were partially right. Outlook allows me to pick columns, but I forgot
that the feature was available.
I don't see the feature on two web MUAs or two phone MUAs that I checked.
Doug Foster
-Original Message-
From: dmarc [mailto:dmarc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alessandro
On 6/30/20 10:49 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> There are also some which don't seem to have found a way to deliver
> valid DKIM signatures, such as those at lists.sourceforge.net.
Yes; they seem to be signing with both sf.net and sourceforge.net, but
neither signature verifies successfully.
