On 3/21/2024 7:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On March 21, 2024 11:39:35 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
For t=y, DKIM says:
y This domain is testing DKIM. Verifiers MUST NOT treat
messages
from Signers in
On March 21, 2024 11:39:35 PM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM Scott Kitterman
>wrote:
>
>> >> For t=y, DKIM says:
>> >>
>> >>y This domain is testing DKIM. Verifiers MUST NOT treat
>> messages
>> >> from Signers in testing mode
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> >> For t=y, DKIM says:
> >>
> >>y This domain is testing DKIM. Verifiers MUST NOT treat
> messages
> >> from Signers in testing mode differently from unsigned email,
> >> even should the signature fail to
It appears that Todd Herr said:
> 2. That part of 6376 might be better written as "Should the signature
> fail to verify, verifiers MUST NOT treat messages from Signers in testing
> mode differently from unsigned email." as I see no reason to penalize a
> Domain Owner who successfully
On March 21, 2024 2:15:00 PM UTC, Todd Herr
wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
>> On Wed 20/Mar/2024 23:11:20 +0100 Matthäus Wander wrote:
>> > Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
>> >> what is the result of DMARC on having, say
>> >>
>> >>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 10:15 AM Todd Herr wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
>> On Wed 20/Mar/2024 23:11:20 +0100 Matthäus Wander wrote:
>> > Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
>> >> what is the result of DMARC on having, say
>> >>
>> >>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:55 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Wed 20/Mar/2024 23:11:20 +0100 Matthäus Wander wrote:
> > Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
> >> what is the result of DMARC on having, say
> >>
> >> dkim=pass (testing key)
> >> or
> >> dkim=policy (512 byte key)
On Wed 20/Mar/2024 23:11:20 +0100 Matthäus Wander wrote:
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
what is the result of DMARC on having, say
dkim=pass (testing key)
or
dkim=policy (512 byte key)
is that akin to SPF neutral, i.e. dmarc=fail?
dkim=pass results in dmarc=pass (if
Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
what is the result of DMARC on having, say
dkim=pass (testing key)
or
dkim=policy (512 byte key)
is that akin to SPF neutral, i.e. dmarc=fail?
dkim=pass results in dmarc=pass (if the domain is aligned). The comment
in brackets is for
