On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:18:47 PM John Levine wrote:
> >Most of the recent work has been in regard to coordinating and testing the
> >four (4) known implementations of the ARC spec (Google, AOL, dkimpy,
> >OpenARC). They are each in various stages of completion/readiness for
> >production.
>
On Monday, October 17, 2016 07:18:47 PM John Levine wrote:
> >Most of the recent work has been in regard to coordinating and testing the
> >four (4) known implementations of the ARC spec (Google, AOL, dkimpy,
> >OpenARC). They are each in various stages of completion/readiness for
> >production.
>
> More generally, I think the document needs quite a bit of polish. The core
> material seems to be there but I've got some qualms with its organization,
> flow, etc. This may also be contributing to a false veneer of complexity.
> When I'm done the first round of coding, I'll route some energy
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Working group:
> Have all of you reviewed the ARC documents? Does the dearth of
> discussion of them mean they're close to ready?
>
I've been working on an open source implementation. It consists largely of