Hi Seil,
在 2015年4月13日 星期一，下午10:02，Seil Jeon 写道：
> Hi Dapeng,
>
> I think your draft should not be compared with our draft. Our draft is
> proposing some missing points through case study based on the on-demand
> mobility draft.
> Your draft seems proposing a different way, which is away fr
Hi Dapeng,
I think your draft should not be compared with our draft. Our draft is
proposing some missing points through case study based on the on-demand
mobility draft.
Your draft seems proposing a different way, which is away from the on-demand
mobility draft, from the definition of the p
Hi Danny,
If you have read
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sijeon-dmm-use-cases-api-source-00,
The main idea of the draft is proposing to define the following flag:
3.1
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sijeon-dmm-use-cases-api-source-00#section-3.1).
Suggested indication flag IPV6_PREFE
Again – what exactly are you comparing? Please be more specific.
From: Dapeng Liu [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 16:28
To: Moses, Danny
Cc: Seil Jeon; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: 回复： [DMM] Answer on raised questions for the proposed API
在 2015年4月13日 星期一，下午9:21，Moses, Danny
在 2015年4月13日 星期一，下午9:21，Moses, Danny 写道：
> What is simpler. Can you be more specific? What are you comparing?
>
>
>
“similar" not “simpler”.
Regards,
Dapeng Liu
>
>
> Thanks,
> /Danny
>
> From: Dapeng Liu [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 1
What is simpler. Can you be more specific? What are you comparing?
Thanks,
/Danny
From: Dapeng Liu [mailto:maxpass...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 15:54
To: Seil Jeon
Cc: Moses, Danny; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: 回复： [DMM] Answer on raised questions for the proposed API
Hell
Hello Seil, Danny：
[as an individual contributor]
You can refer to the following two drafts:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-dmm-address-selection-01
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-dmm-mobility-api-02
Is it the similar idea?
--
Dapeng Liu
在 2015年4月13日 星期一，上午6:03，Seil Jeon 写
