You are right Uma, Any deployment scenario (aside from green-field) will involve a combination of both address types. IPv4 will be the dominant type at first while IPv6 gets introduced gradually. Any mobility solution must address migration. Blank canvas is a nonstarter for operators.
Arashmid > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri > Sent: 23 May 2018 13:08 > To: Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com>; Satoru Matsushima > <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> > Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP > > Dear All, > > For the Dino's question - > > > Do you think carriers will build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time? > > I don't think so (from the existing deployments perspective, including early > 5G transitions). > > So, IMO - any mobility solution ought to be underlay independent - to allow > flexibility for the operators. I see this discussion is independent of address > space exhaustion or IPv6 address to UE.. > > -- > Uma C. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 5:02 PM > To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> > Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP > > That sounds like you want to do IPv4 over IPv6. Do you think carriers will > build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time? > > Dino > > > On Mar 20, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Satoru Matsushima > <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Next header type maybe? > > Interestingly GTP-U doesn’t have it. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > 2018/03/20 18:17、Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com>のメール: > > > >> How? Please summarize in one sentence and don’t me to a draft. > >> > >> Dino > >> > >>> On Mar 20, 2018, at 10:24 AM, Satoru Matsushima > <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes , supports IPv4 PDU with minimum effort. > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>> 2018/03/20 16:47、Lyle Bertz <lyleb551...@gmail.com>のメール: > >>> > >>>> I did not get to ask but I know your presentation talks about IPv6 but is > there a requirement to support IPv4 mobile or dual stack? > >>>> > >>>> Lyle > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> dmm mailing list > >>> dmm@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >> > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
