Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document - Objections

2021-01-06 Thread Joel M. Halpern
In line, Joel On 1/6/2021 5:29 PM, Kaippallimalil John wrote: Joel, This draft is not attempting to lay out a new architecture. The figure and architecture section are there to provide context for the reader. The draft is also not asserting that these are the only ways to solve the issue. The

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document - Objections

2021-01-06 Thread Kaippallimalil John
Joel, This draft is not attempting to lay out a new architecture. The figure and architecture section are there to provide context for the reader. The draft is also not asserting that these are the only ways to solve the issue. The last portion of the draft only refers to applicability since

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document - Objections

2021-01-06 Thread Behcet Sarikaya
This is an excellent review. More below. On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:11 PM Joel M. Halpern wrote: > Looking agin at the document, I have multiple problems with adoption of > this document. > > First, as just discussed, it seems to be laying out an archtiecture, but > that architecture is not