Hi Uma and all,
I have read the document and got a few questions:
In my understanding, in the UPF where traffic policy is enforced, the
fine-granularity services are provided. Then what fields in the GTP-u
encapsulation indicates the traffic's service requirements? When a GTP-u tunnel
goes
Dear Chairs,
Sorry for the late reply.
After reading this document and the discussion on the list, I also think some
alignment with the TEAS working group on the definition, terminology and
framework of network slice would be helpful.
As for the technical aspects, to my understanding this
Thank you Luis.
Regards
Sri
From: "Luis M. Contreras"
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 11:08 AM
To: Sri Gundavelli
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Hi Sri, all,
apologies for being late, just to express my support as
Hi Sri, all,
apologies for being late, just to express my support as co-author (I have
been off for some days, just realized now the closure of the poll)
In any case I agree on and remark the need of making documents consistent
across WGs.
Best regards
Luis
El mié, 20 ene 2021 a las 19:43,
Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback.
* Chairs
From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)"
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM
To: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
