: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>
Cc: Moses, Danny <danny.mo...@intel.com>; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
Lyle, sorry for my late response.
> [...]
> Type of the accompanying value.
Ah, okay.
> There was a l
; False=Permit).
I think so too.
cheers,
--satoru
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:32 PM
> To: Moses, Danny <danny.mo...@intel.com>
> Cc: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject:
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 7:32 PM
To: Moses, Danny <danny.mo...@intel.com>
Cc: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
Now I seems I’m confused when I see what does the typ
:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 23:45
> To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
>
> So, then I don’t see the point of changing the curren
I am OK with the current structure.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 23:45
To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
So, then I don
we can Proposal 2 makes sense but not necessarily for both
Actions and Descriptors.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu<mailto:marco.lieb...@neclab.eu>>;
dmm@ietf.or
ut not necessarily for both
Actions and Descriptors.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu<mailto:marco.lieb...@neclab.eu>>;
dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: R
of one but if we can Proposal 2 makes sense but not necessarily for both
Actions and Descriptors.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu<mailto:marco.lieb...@neclab.eu>>
cannot think
of one but if we can Proposal 2 makes sense but not necessarily for both
Actions and Descriptors.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 9:42 AM
To: Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu>; dmm@ietf.org
Subject
t;
> marco
>
>
>
>
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. November 2017 16:33
> To: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
>
> Proposal from Satoru: Move Action-Value
]
|+-[Action-Value]
marco
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch
Sent: Donnerstag, 16. November 2017 16:33
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule
Proposal from Satoru: Move Action-Value to
[Rule-Definition]->[Act
Proposal from Satoru: Move Action-Value to
[Rule-Definition]->[Action-Reference]. Same for Descriptor-Value, which may go
to [Rule-Definition]->[Action-Definition].
Reason: To make sure "Define once, use many" throughout the models.
What to change:
Current Policy substructure looks as
12 matches
Mail list logo
