was regarding how the host (and application)
can use this information.
Best Regards,
John
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Dolson
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:53 AM
To: Moses, Danny
Cc: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] mobility and link state
Danny,
I
(and application)
can use this information.
Best Regards,
John
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Dolson
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:53 AM
To: Moses, Danny
Cc: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] mobility and link state
Danny,
I entirely agree with what you
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your comments.
In general, I agree that it is preferable to hide data-link-related events from
applications. At least, this use to be the case in the stationary world (as
opposed to mobile).
With the introduction of mobile platforms, the event of a temporary loss of
Danny,
I entirely agree with what you say about the motivation for the work.
But if I may be really picky, I think the required notification is not about
link state per se, rather about source IP changes.
Suppose an application could find out about the different IP addresses
available to it,
this information.
Best Regards,
John
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Dolson
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:53 AM
To: Moses, Danny
Cc: dmm@ietf.orgmailto:dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] mobility and link state
Danny,
I entirely agree with what you say about the motivation
