Re: [DMM] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:13 AM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) wrote: > Tom, > > Your understanding is correct: in the traditional mode there is no pushed SRH > • Less MTU overhead than GTP in traditional mode. > • In enhanced mode with underlay TE with SLA bandwidth

Re: [DMM] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01.txt]

Hi Alex, Thanks a lot for your review. Comments inline below. On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 18:29 +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > > Le 06/03/2018 à 23:17, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We have submitted a revised version of our draft addressing the > > comments we got in

[DMM] Substantial comments on draft draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility

This message contains a list of substantial comments received for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility. These comments were received on the DMM mailing list, during DMM WG session and via other email exchange. They are ordered from most resent to older ones: *Provide on the mailing list,