Le 11/11/2013 16:29, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) a écrit :
Hi Pete,
I'm not sure, I agree with this, or understand this to be precise. I
do not know know CP (in the form of PMIP, GTP or some other protocol
XYZ) can be completely eliminated. There needs to be some interface
between the access
Alex - So, the proposal is to get rid of the MIP signaling plane and
piggyback on some routing updates, or over OpenFlow ? So, what is the
result, we use a generic non-MIP interfaces and make them look like MIP
interfaces ? What is the point ? This is DMM ?
Regards
Sri
On 11/11/13 7:51 AM,
I think we need a draft from Pete on this so we can all understand what is
being proposed.
Regards,
Behcet
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
sgund...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi Pete,
I'm not sure, I agree with this, or understand this to be precise. I do
not know know
Hi, Alex,
When it comes to injecting routes into the routing infrastructure,
I think we have to use the proxy model. It doesn't make sense for
the MN to be speaking to the access network's routing protocol. This
means the MAG will need to authenticate the MN and check that the
IP addresses
