I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document;
I only have an editorial comment - Section 2 makes reference to an EPC
and a few other acronyms. Expanding a few of these out may help some
readers.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen jouni.nos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
[as an individual contributor]
I support the adoption of this document.
- Jouni
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Hi Danny and Alper,
In this draft, you seem to be considering only DHCPv6 address delegation for
when the node is acting as a mobile host. I am wondering if there are similar
considerations for DHCPv6 prefix delegation for when the node is acting as
a mobile router.
But then, I wonder whether
[as an individual contributor]
I support the adoption of this document.
- Jouni
4/2/2015, 7:21 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-wt-dmm-fpc-cpdp-00
to confirm the adoption as a DMM WG document. The call ends April 16th
EOB PDT.
I support adoption of this I-D
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the
I support the adoption of this draft.
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghy...@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:38 AM, pierrick.se...@orange.com wrote:
