Re: [DMM] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost-02.txt

2015-10-22 Thread Peter McCann
Prefix coloring in its current form is not going to work. If I tell the MN that an address is "Fixed" and will always be on-link I am making a promise that cannot be kept. The MN can always move to an unaffiliated network that is unable to tunnel/route the packets to the current point of

Re: [DMM] FW: New Version Notification for draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost-02.txt

2015-10-22 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
> It is intended as a measure of the amount of state being maintained in the > network on behalf of this prefix and the amount of transport resources being > expended to tunnel/route the packets to the current point of attachment. This is exactly the point. We cannot represent that “state” and

[DMM] note takers for IETF94 DMM meeting

2015-10-22 Thread Jouni Korhonen
You can volunteer in advance before we volunteer someone during the meeting administrivia ;-) - Jouni & Dapeng ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm