Hi,
Thanks for letting us know the draft does not intend to define the BBF hybrid
access arch any more. And yes, I noticed the reference [WT-348] had been
removed in the 02 version, but "Hybrid Access" is a term defined by BBF WT-348
so it should be removed from the text to avoid misleading.
> but "Hybrid Access" is a term defined by BBF WT-348 so it should be
>removed from the text to avoid misleading.
We will consider this feedback.
> As the draft intends not to refer to BBF WT-348's "DSL+LTE" use-case,
>Figure 1 should be removed.
The extension is not tied to any specific
