Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Well one can always pursue ISE/AD sponsored track if one so feels like. Just saying there are options.. if one desires to go through the WG process DMM has provisions for Mobile IPv6 protocol family maintenance work. Jouni Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos.. > Behcet Sarikaya

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jouni.nosmap wrote: > Well one can always pursue ISE/AD sponsored track if one so feels like. > > Just saying there are options.. if one desires to go through the WG process > DMM has provisions for Mobile IPv6 protocol family maintenance

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Hi Alex, all, My understanding of what Jouni wrote is that it’s fine to work on MIP6 improvement, but the MIP4 can live its life as is, to which I totally agree. And I also agree with Alex that we need to fix bugs in MIP6 (and the related suite, in particular NEMO) and progress them in the

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

Hi Thierry, DMM has the charter for the NEMO protocol maintenance. So, it is the right group and you should be able to bring maintenance and deployment related extensions to this group. Regards Sri > On Jan 8, 2016, at 6:50 AM, Thierry Ernst wrote: > > > Hi Alex,

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > > As Sri pointed out DMM is OK to work on "maintenance-oriented extensions of > the Mobile IPv6 protocol family". So this is likely the venue within IETF. > Mobile IPv4 as such has no place here. > Why not ISE? For

Re: [DMM] conclusion of adoption calls

As Sri pointed out DMM is OK to work on "maintenance-oriented extensions of the Mobile IPv6 protocol family". So this is likely the venue within IETF. Mobile IPv4 as such has no place here. - Jouni 1/8/2016, 6:50 AM, Thierry Ernst kirjoitti: Hi Alex, all, My understanding of what Jouni