Hi Hannu,
Thank you for your comment. Actually, draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis was started as related work of UPPS in 3GPP, but this is neutral analysis of 5G user plane and not tied to specific IETF protocol. Thus, it seems not appropriate to conclude with description related to SRv6, an IETF specific protocol. Also, if some of dmm folks can recognize worth on this work itself, we will be able to change the introduction and conclusion to be independent of UPPS. Anyway, we'll consider conclusion of this document. Thank you very much. Regards, Shunsuke From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Flinck, Hannu (Nokia - FI/Espoo) Sent: Thursday, January 2, 2020 8:55 PM To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Comment to draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt and draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt Hello Draft-ietf-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-03.txt says that "This work is corresponding to the User Plane Protocol Study work on 3GPP side." In order to appreciate that intent and to keep 3GPP and DMM views somehow aligned, I would suggest that in this document and preferably also in draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-07.txt you will add a mentioning about outcome of the 3GPP user plan study that concludes that "3GPP has concluded to not standardize the SRv6 user plane protocol" [TR29.892]. Best regards Hannu
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
