As far as I can tell, this document still attempts to redefine 3GPP
standards in an IETF standards track document. That is in my view
unacceptable.
Yes, those sections are labelled "informational". But they are still
the same content, presented the same way. Pretending they are
Folks:
We have issued a WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane in April of last
year. Based on the feedback and the comments from the WG, we chose to hold the
document so the authors can resolve the identified issues from that LC. The
authors have worked with the reviewers and have revised
